Judge Cunningham Gets It Right

Erie County Judge Judge William Cunningham shocked both the District Attorney and and the defense attorney when he sentenced Teri Rhodes to 9 to 18 years, almost the maximum, for voluntary manslaughter in the suffocation death of her newborn daughter.  Both of them were expecting a much lighter sentence for the Mercyhurst College student who hid her pregnancy, gave birth in her on-campus apartment, and then left her newborn daughter in a plastic bag to suffocate.  The defense attorney had hoped that the sentence would be under two years, which would allow Miss Rhodes to serve at the Erie County Prison, instead of a state prison for women. 

There will undoubtedly be appeals.  Prosecutor Brad Foulk was angered by Judge Cunningham’s suggestion that Foulk had treated Teri Rhodes more leniently than other defendants who were not white and college educated.  Defense Attorney Philip Friedman called the sentence “an outrage”, vowing to appeal it and to seek to have Judge Cunningham removed from the case.  He accused the judge of acting as prosecutor and jury, and giving a sentence inconsistent with the crime of voluntary manslaughter. 

Judge Cunningham was right, and his rationale for sentencing shows that he thought very long and hard about the case.

The full 36 page rationale for sentencing can be found here.

STATEMENT OF SENTENCING RATIONALE

[Warning: the details in this case are just heartbreaking.  So many people came so close to stopping this crime, but none of them quite succeeded.]

While the judge had to accept the plea-bargain that reduced the charges to voluntary manslaughter, and therefore had to pronounce a sentence within the limits of that charge, he looked at the case differently during sentencing.

He explained that Miss Rhodes lied on a multitude of occasions to hide her pregnancy, even though she had many friends and a family who could have helped her.  She also had access to services that could have helped her with the pregnancy, or taken care of the baby once it was born. 

He also detailed the many people who had tried to help her, and who suspected that she was pregnant, including a friend, her coach, and both parents.  If she had told one less lie, this baby would be alive today.  Her repeated lies also showed that she was not “temporarily insane” and unaware of what she was doing.

Additionally, he pointed out that she had researched ways of getting rid of “her problem” for a long period of time.  Though this evidence was not used for a charge of first degree murder, it did become an aggravating factor at sentencing.

When the judge looked at “mitigating factors,” he came to the conclusion that all of the things she had going for her, including her friends, her supportive family, and her personal qualities, were things that should have kept her from committing the crime, not things that made the crime less horrendous.  If he accepted these as mitigating factors, then he would logically have to accept a two-tiered sentencing structure, where middle-class, intelligent criminals with good families received lighter sentences than less well-off criminals.  He was not willing to accept this approach to sentencing. 

He also looked at the sentence of Chytoria Graham, a local woman who had recently been sentenced to 5-10 years for aggravated assault, for swinging her 4-week old son at her boyfriend during a fight.  He noted that it would be inconsistent to have a longer sentence for assaulting a child (who later recovered) than for actually killing a child.  He also noted that in Pennsylvania, there are many cases where the minimum sentence for  aggravated assault or rape of a child often leads to a longer sentence than actually killing a child.

Given all these considerations, he concluded that it was necessary to give a long sentence to emphasize the gravity of the offence of killing a baby.  This was necessary though this particular defendant is likely not to be a repeat offender.

Anyhow, pray for Teri Rhodes.  God has forgiven worse crimes, and her life could be turned around.  If she is a good prisoner, she will be about 29 when she gets out, and there is life after age 29.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Judge Cunningham Gets It Right

  1. This is sad, that a young person her age is willing to throw about a part of her life in such a way and poor baby! I wonder how she would feel if someone tries to suffocate her! did she think about that? that baby was tiny, helpless! this is too shocking for my system to read! not even animals do that! but as you say, God is a forgiven God and hopefully she turns to Him!

  2. The person with the hardest time in forgiving Teri Rhodes will be Teri herself. I believe a punishment of this magnitude is necessary to give her time and help to be able to forgive herself. And if she is genuinely sorry, she can be sure that she has already attained the forgiveness of God.

  3. Dale, well said. You can’t repent and be forgiven for a “big mistake,” but only for something you admit was absolutely wrong. If it is not made clear to her that what she did is viewed as truly wrong by others, she’s likely to be tormented by guilt but never able to understand that she can be forgiven, because she’s likely to think that her guilt isn’t “real,” but only something “wrong” with her.

  4. I’m certain there’s much more to this case than Prosecutor Brad Foulk and the investigators brought forth.

    My god – what kind of sports physician gives an 18 year old in her 9th month of pregnancy the green light to play volley ball? For a brief moment, she actually did the right thing. Teri went to a doctor and the doctor seemed to agree that she wasn’t pregnant.

    Preposterous!

    Did money exchange hands? Was the doctor covering for a willing couple waiting patiently to take this baby?

    There was an opportunity for Teri and her baby to be saved.

    The doctor should be brought before an ethics panel!

  5. Medical examinations for sports are notoriously cursory. Usually they consist of asking questions, and a little blood pressure and stethoscope work, usually with all clothing on. Generally, the assumption is that the patient is generally healthy and is acting in good faith and only something very glaring will be picked up.

    If Teri was effectively hiding her pregnancy, and didn’t raise the issue, and the doctor didn’t ask (or she lied convincingly enough), there’s no reason a sports physical would have picked it up.

    That may be an indictment of the system of sports physicals, but it’s not necessarily to postulate underhandedness on the part of the doctor to see how it could have happened, if Teri was determined that no one should know (or possibly, based on testimony, in serious denial herself.)

  6. BTW, how would being somehow involved in an adoption scheme — even if that were more than a wild supposition — make the doctor more willing to clear Teri to do something that could be dangerous to the baby? That doesn’t make sense.

  7. Dear Lunch Admin.,

    Welcome to my blog.

    I am not sure why you are suggesting there is a hidden scheme. Do you have any evidence for this scheme, or any idea what that scheme might be? If not, it’s best not to make accusations.

    If you read the 36 page statement of the sentencing rationale, you would see that there were many opportunities for the baby to be saved. Unfortunately, Teri Rhodes couldn’t tell the truth even once, until it was too late.

    I agree with SheWhoPicksUpToys about most physicals given to young people. My 17-year-old daughter had to take a sports physical every semester for cross-country and track, and then a pre-employment physical. Each of these physicals was very cursory, and relied heavily on the patient’s response to questions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s